LCD vs DVLED: Choose the Right Technology for the Right Application

In a world where Direct View LED (DVLED) is becoming the dominant technology for new video wall installations, does the multi-display LCD video wall still have a place?

Recently, I encountered several instances where clients were interested in DVLED walls but found that a multi-display LCD wall was a better fit for their application. One such case involved a sports bar, and I want to detail why we chose LCD over DVLED in this instance.

LCD display example
direct view led example
AIO dvLED

The sports bar client was initially interested in a 1.88mm pixel pitch 163” all-in-one DVLED display which can be a great choice to get a large, bright, full HD (1920 x 1080) display in a relatively compact and cost-effective form. video wall All-in-one DVLED displays are a great option as they do not require external LED controllers/sender units to operate since all the required components are built into the unit, so it functions like a standard monitor, and there are typically several predefined sizes to work in various environments.  The other option for DVLED is a custom video wall solution. Custom DVLED walls are a good option when you have an application requiring a specific size display, atypical aspect ratio, or need specific resolutions or brightness levels.  Custom DVLED allows the user the broadest choice in selecting products to meet the needs of their individual application, but generally requires a more complex installation using external LED controllers/sender units.

low resolution imageIn this example, after talking with the client, it was determined that the better way to achieve their goals was to use LCD technology due to one primary factor, resolution.  The client stated that they wanted to have multiple unique images on the display simultaneously, up to 9 different sporting events or advertisements on the wall at any given time. While it is possible to show the required number of images on the DVLED display using external video processing, the resolution of each image would end up being very low using the DVLED display discussed.

In the sports bar example, if we created 9 images on the 163” 1920 x 1080 resolution display, each image would be approximately 54.3” diagonal and have a resolution of 640 x 360 which is not ideal (see simulated images below).  This leaves us two options to explore to get a higher resolution individual image on the display wall, either go with a custom DVLED solution with a finer pixel pitch or change to an LCD display array.

LCD lo resolution
LCD hi resolution

If we went the custom DVLED path, we would need to use a sub 1mm pixel pitch to see a significant increase in resolution, as well as incorporate external video processing to create the multiple windows desired.  This would end up being cost prohibitive for the project.  If we change to a multi-display 55” LCD option, we can create a 3-display high by 3-display wide array of 9 total displays with the entire array being 165” 5760 x 3240 resolution, and each of the nine 55” images will have a 1920 x 1080 resolution which would be ideal.  Additionally, most commercial LCD displays designed for use in a video wall array application have a feature to allow you to create an image on the array of displays (or a subset of the array) that will span multiple monitors without the need for any external video processing equipment.  By changing to the LCD array, we were able to provide the client with not only the ability to show nine full HD resolution images on the array, but also being able to show one large image spanning the entire array or one enlarged image spanning four of the displays on the array and individual full HD images on the remaining five displays, and for a similar price point to the 163” all-in-one DVLED display.

9 panels
9 panels 1 image
9 panels mixed configuration

I wanted to highlight this use case to convey that the latest trends in technology aren’t always the best fit for a given application.  While DVLED has many advantages over LCD, such as, no bezel spacing between panels, greater ability to customize the physical layout, and higher available brightness levels, the end user needs should be evaluated for each project before the technology is considered for the application.  In this instance, the most important needs for the client were to have multiple high-resolution images on the display simultaneously and have the technology fit within the physical parameters of the chosen wall, so the LCD array was a better choice.

If you are considering a video wall for your next project, discuss these key factors with your design or integration partner to make sure you get the most appropriate technology for the application:

Desired content layout and usage

  • Do you just want one large image from a single source, or would you like to display multiple sources/images at the same time?
  • What type of content will you be showing primarily? (i.e., text/documents, video, construction plans, custom signage, etc.)
  • Will the display need to be running 24/7, or does this application only require periodic use and the ability to fully power down the system is desired?

Physical constraints of the space

  • Does the display need to fit within a certain area on a wall?
  • Are there any room constraints that need to be overcome? (i.e., poor light control in the desired location, power restrictions at the desired location, construction limitations at the desired location, cabling limitations, etc.)
  • Is the ceiling height sufficient to get the size of display needed for the application, or is a smaller primary display with additional repeater monitors within the room required to accommodate the audience?

Other considerations

  • How flexible is the technology budget for the room, does the display absolutely need to fit within a certain price range, or will the budget be determined based on the most appropriate technology for the space?
  • Are there any special requirements for the display? (i.e., We don’t want to see any bezel gaps on the display regardless of cost)

Transforming Your Business with AV Outsourcing. See how teaming with Exertis Almo can give your business an edge by expanding reach and establishing recurring revenue. Learn more ⟫

Dominic Pizza - Headshot

About the Author

Dominic Pizza | CTS-D

ECC – Design Engineer

The AV MBA | You Can’t Always Get What You Want

options to considerAs I write this article, my truck is in the shop having new tires put on. Buying tires is one of my least favorite purchases of all time!!! Yet every few years I go through the same process. Gather my tire size information, check some tire websites, identify my needs in terms of performance (I live in Buffalo, NY, so a tire that performs well in the snow is a must!!!), establish my budget, read some reviews, select my top picks, shop prices, book the appointment.

This time around, I’m coming off a set of tires that performed very poorly in terms of mileage. They only lasted 24,000 miles and I rotated them every 5,000 miles. That is TERRIBLE!!! Additionally, they had a highway tread, which was good for gas mileage, but didn’t give me the traction I needed in the deep Buffalo snow. Finally, my service to this point has been done at the dealer. However, my free service package has timed out, and the dealer is farther away and more expensive than most of my local shops, so I am no longer motivated to use them.

Based on those factors, I shopped around for an All-Terrain tire at a discounted price from what my dealership was offering that got great reviews and picked the lowest priced local auto shop. While the tire I chose is more expensive than my original set, I will get better on-road performance and a longer tread life. This brings my total cost of ownership below the level of my current set of tires. I can live with that.assess the tradeoffs

Weighing the Options for Your Next AV Project

When working on audio-video (AV) projects, there are several tradeoffs to consider ensuring the project meets its objectives while staying within budget and time constraints. Here are some key tradeoffs:

Cost vs. Quality

    • High-Quality Equipment: Investing in top-tier equipment can provide superior audio and video quality, but it comes at a higher cost.
    • Budget-Friendly Options: Opting for more affordable equipment can save money but might compromise on performance and longevity.

Complexity vs. Usability

    • Advanced Features: Incorporating advanced features and automation can enhance functionality but may require more complex setup and user training.
    • Simplicity: A simpler system is easier to use and maintain but might lack some advanced capabilities.

Flexibility vs. Specificity

    • Flexible Systems: Designing a system that can adapt to various uses and future upgrades can be beneficial but might be more expensive and complex.
    • Specific Systems: Tailoring the system to specific needs can be more cost-effective and straightforward but may limit future adaptability.

Aesthetics vs. Functionality

    • Aesthetic Design: Prioritizing the visual appeal of the setup can enhance the user experience but might limit equipment choices and placement.
    • Functional Design: Focusing on functionality ensures optimal performance but might result in a less visually appealing setup.

Scalability vs. Initial Investment

    • Scalable Solutions: Investing in scalable solutions allows for future expansion but requires a higher initial investment.
    • Fixed Solutions: Implementing a fixed solution can be more affordable initially but may not accommodate future growth.

Integration vs. Independence

    • Integrated Systems: Integrating AV systems with other building systems (like lighting and HVAC) can provide seamless control but increases complexity and cost.
    • Independent Systems: Keeping systems independent simplifies installation and maintenance but might reduce overall efficiency and user experience.

Maintenance vs. Initial Cost

    • High-Quality, Low-Maintenance Equipment: Investing in high-quality equipment can reduce long-term maintenance costs but requires a higher initial investment.
    • Lower-Cost, Higher-Maintenance Equipment: Choosing cheaper equipment can save on initial costs but may lead to higher maintenance expenses over time.

balancing tradeoffsBalancing these tradeoffs requires careful planning and consideration of the project’s specific needs and constraints. Conducting a feasibility study and involving all stakeholders in the planning process can help identify the best approach 1 2. This way, you will be on the road to success and avoid getting stuck in the mud!!!

Is there a specific aspect of AV projects you’re focusing on or a particular challenge you’re facing? Get in touch to discuss.

Want more business development advice? Check out Tom’s earlier blog, “The AV MBA: Put Your Keys on the Dash!“.
Tom Keefe BDM

About the Author

Tom Keefe | CTS, DMC-D-4K, DSCE

Category Manager – dvLED

Supported Category: Direct View LED

AV Design Engineering vs. Project Engineering

Project vs. Design Engineering

When I first joined the AV industry almost 20 years ago, I worked as a project manager for a small integrator in Baltimore. My understanding of AV engineering at that time could be summarized as “there are real engineers (those that worked for my company) and then there are consultants and designers”. The rationale for this skewed perspective was simple: consultants and designers handed us (the integrator) a design full of holes and assumptions, and it was our job to fix those “mistakes” and turn the project into a real-life system that a real-life person could use and benefit from.

av integratorOf course, this naïve and incorrect view was the result of being on only one side of the fence. In the following years, I have been lucky enough to serve in several different roles throughout the industry, from design engineer at a major university, to project engineer, to consultant. Each of these roles has presented different sets of challenges, but more importantly, they have allowed me to see the industry from both sides of the fence, and how each of these roles complement each other to produce satisfactory results for clients and end users.

So what are the actual differences between the “project” engineering and “design” engineering roles? From a distance, these can appear to be two descriptions of the same task, but as we’ll see the differences are significant, beneficial, and necessary for the success of larger-scale projects.

Definitions

For the purposes of this post, we’ll divide the engineering roles into two categories: Project Engineering and Design Engineering. Project Engineering is typically undertaken by one or multiple engineers working for or on behalf of an AV Integrator to produce construction drawings to be used by installers working for that integrator. Design Engineering, on the other hand, is typically undertaken by an independent consultant or pre-sales engineer, creating conceptual drawings which will typically be used by an integrator to create construction drawings.

Goals

As previously stated, an AV Project Engineer is producing construction-level drawings which will actually be used by technicians to install a system. This entails a much higher level of detail and specificity than expected in design-level drawings. As products are being purchased and labor hours are being spent based on the information contained in the drawing package, money is on the line. Every connector, cable, adaptor, and piece of mounting hardware must be accounted for and documented. Cable pull sheets can be generated from these drawings, so cables must be identified and labeled in an understandable scheme. The financial (and technical) success of the installation and project are often reliant upon the accuracy of these drawings. For example, if a Project Engineer overlooks the need for HDMI extension for a long cable run, an extender set may need to be ordered from the field, which can lead to project delays and significant cost impacts.

By contrast, the AV Design Engineer is responsible for creating a design set of conceptual drawings which reflect the project goals set forth by the end user. These conceptual drawings will then be interpreted by the Project Engineer to create the construction drawings. The Design Engineer is expected to have a much closer relationship with the end user, to ensure that the project goals are met, while considering any constraints (budget, timeline, aesthetics) identified by the end user.

Time and Money

Why then do we need to have design drawings at all? Why can’t the Project Engineer simply take the end user’s goals and design the system to construction level all by themselves without the need for a Design Engineer?

As with many things in business and life, the answer comes down to time and money. A Design Engineer is typically contracted directly to the end user or architect via a design contract. This happens very early in the development process, before contractors have been hired. The design team then has the time to meet with the client and stakeholders well before “boots are on the ground”. Budgets can be established, designs can be iterated and reiterated (and re-reiterated) with minimal impact on the overall project budget. Put simply, it is easy and relatively cost-free to make design changes on paper. Changes on-site are a different matter altogether.

Once construction contracts have been issued, boots are on the ground, and drywall is being hung, changes to the design of a system can have massive cost implications. Most integrators do not have engineers on staff that they can commit to being part of a multi-month or multi-year design process. Once they have been hired, they are on the clock to finish the project with (hopefully) a bit of profit in their pockets.

Relationships

An often-overlooked aspect of the importance of the division of the design and project engineering roles is that of impartiality and bias in relationships. While it can be expected that, as professionals, both Project and Design Engineers should value the relationship with the client equally highly as their bottom line, the same expectation might not always be true when it comes to product selection.

business relationshipsAV integrators, by their nature, must have relationships with the manufacturers of products that they sell and install. To ensure competitive pricing, on-time delivery, and pre- and post-sale support, integrators must cultivate and maintain these manufacturer relationships. Through no fault of their own, this means that integrators will tend to want to sell products provided by manufacturers with which they have good relationships.

While this is all well and good for the integrator, the needs of the project and end user may dictate equipment made by other manufacturers. This is where the value of independent Design Engineers and Consultants is made known. Rather than relying on the product offerings of a few select manufacturers, the independent Design Engineer can select the proper product for the application, regardless of the manufacturer.

Conclusion

While I wish I could go back and tell my younger self these important distinctions, the truth is that it took living and working in both the design and project engineering roles to truly appreciate the differences, as well as the necessity of both roles in the industry. Successful deployments of large-scale AV projects require both the design and project engineer specializations, and we should all be thankful for that!

Interested in more design or engineering related content? Check out “Revisiting ADA Mounting Requirements“.

John Rossman - headshot-frame

About the Author

John Rossman | CTS

BDM II – Technical Specialist

Supported Manufacturers: Harman ProfessionalAKG, AMX, BSS, Crown, DBX, JBL, Lexicon, Martin, & Soundcraft

Stop, Collaborate, and Listen

Collaboration is often defined in many different ways.  Not near as much fun to say as it used to be in the 80’s… “Stop, Collaborate and Listen.”  BUT nevertheless, important.  Important in the sense that we do literally need to stop, collaborate and listen to/with our colleagues, leadership, customers, vendors and many others.  This requires the proper PRO AV gear to efficiently and effectively work with anyone and everyone on projects.

Exertis Almo Category Managers

This year I had the pleasure of returning to a familiar role.  Tweaked to fit the current time.  Exertis Almo has identified areas in which we need “Category Managers”.  We have a CM for Audio and one for dvLED.  I have taken on the role of Category Manager for Collaboration.

Am I in sales?  Sort of.  Marketing?  A little bit.  Business Development? Yes, that too.  My entire position focuses on helping our internal sales team and most importantly, our customers/dealers in the world of collaboration.  First, and possibly foremost, I am brand independent.  I work with each individual to meet the wants and needs of the end user to identify the best products available for their particular collaboration application.  (That’s kind of fun to say.)

I am not an engineer or designer.  However, I am more than capable of recommending the proper gear for a Microsoft Teams or Zoom room (to name a couple of biggies).   I also have a solid team of colleagues surrounding me, should I need input from an audio expert for instance.

Collaboration Solutions Consultation

music meetingLet’s say Robbie Van Winkle, aka Vanilla Ice, wants to revive his singing career and plans to have Teams meetings with record producers across the globe.  Maybe he needs a PTZ camera that offers tracking via Artificial Intelligence so that the far end will see his expressions as he paces the meeting room.  Perhaps he needs the camera to focus on him and not his entourage in the background.  Maybe he needs a simple, clean audio solution with a fantastic mic array and excellent speakers mounted on the wall.  I would be happy to help Robbie’s AV integrator select the right materials for the job.  AND if Robbie wants to join our meeting, that’s excellent too.

Ok, so I do not have many opportunities with this particular need.  But I could do it!

  • Need the perfect PTZ camera for MTR?
  • Starting from scratch and want to build out a simple huddleroom for BYOD conferencing?
  • Looking for a collaboration solution with a smaller budget than you’re accustomed to?

These are just a very few of the areas where I can assist for the win.  Whether your need is for one huddle room, ten boardrooms, house of worship, education, commercial office space, etc., I come equipped with excellent recommendations to fit the application.

Microsoft Teams and More

MTR SolutionsWhile we offer MTR licensing, we are aware many have a solution in place.  Keep in mind, we can tailor a complete MTR solution, including Teams Room licenses to fit the budget and needs.  Regardless of where you acquire your solution, do you have the right hardware to make for the best meetings?  A camera and audio are a great starting point, but we can help you further.  Do you need to share content with the participants in the room even when not using a conference solution?  Do you need to capture these meetings for later playback?  Has a touch control panel been considered?  Or perhaps an interactive display?

While new build-outs are fun, we can work with existing gear, as well.  OR perhaps you want to upgrade the current system.  I’ll let you know about trade-ins and promos.

I hope to connect with each and every one of you on your next opportunity.  Let me help you create seamless virtual meetings. I want to collaborate with you on collaboration.  (It makes sense, I promise.)

Want to know more about Collaboration Solutions? Check out “AI – The Sincerest Form of Flattery?
Reach out to Lisa on Exertis Almo.com or LinkedIn

Lisa Lingo, BDM

About the Author

Lisa Lingo

Category Manager – Collaboration

Supported Product Category: Collaboration

Esports on Campus: The Role of ProAV in Competitive Gaming

As Esports continues to surge in popularity, college campuses are emerging as key players in the competitive gaming landscape. From campus gaming centers and dedicated arenas to immersive broadcasting experiences, universities are investing in professional audiovisual (Pro AV) solutions to elevate their Esports programs. For systems integrators, this represents a unique opportunity to provide the advanced technology needed to support high-performance gaming environments.

Absen - esports case studiesLet’s explore the key categories of Pro AV technology essential for creating cutting-edge Esports facilities on college campuses and how integrators can play a vital role in the process.

Displays and Video Walls

High-quality displays, including large-format monitors, video walls, and projectors, are essential for both players and spectators. In gaming arenas, video walls allow for large-scale broadcasting of matches, while individual monitors ensure players have the highest resolution and refresh rates for competitive gaming.

The Absen KLCOB Series utilizes professional Micro LED technology for reliable and stable performance that stays cool. Check out these Absen esports case studies.JBL-SRX910LA speaker variety

Audio Systems

Clear and immersive audio is crucial for the player experience and for spectators. Advanced speaker systems and surround sound setups enhance gameplay immersion, while PA systems or distributed audio ensure audiences in live events can hear game commentary and match details.

JBL’s SRX900 Series addresses the growing need for scalable small and medium-format professional sound-reinforcement solutions. The SRX910LA is a two-way active line array element that can cover a variety of mid to large-sized applications. Want to know more? These JBL esports case studies may be of interest.

Broadcast and Streaming Equipment

Esports requires robust streaming capabilities. This includes video capture devices, professional-grade cameras, switchers, and encoding hardware for live streaming games to platforms like Twitch or YouTube. Professional lighting setups are also needed for player cams and audience viewability.lc200 bundle 51pb

Lumen’s Media Processor Bundle equips your space with the ability to record, store and stream video content including the LC200 CaptureVision system and PTZ cameras.

Atlona AVoIP case study gaming center

Control Systems and Signal Management

To manage all the audiovisual elements seamlessly, integrated control systems are needed. This includes AV-over-IP solutions for routing signals across multiple screens, gaming setups, and feeds, along with signal processors to ensure smooth transitions between live feeds, game replays, and announcements.

Atlona Velocity Hardware Gateway AT-VGW-HW-3 provides AV system control, plus room scheduling and AV asset management, and the Velocity System 7″ VESA Mount Touch Panel is designed for both AV control and room scheduling applications.
Atlona Velocity and Vesa touch panel
Optimized for video distribution over GbE infrastructure, deliver the highest quality 4K imagery with extremely low latency to video walls with the Atlona AT-OMNI-121 networked AV decoder featuring the advanced VCx™ codec which delivers artifact-free image presentation, ultra-fast switching, and ultra-low latency. Pair with AT-OMNI-111 AVoIP Encoder. For more insights, check out the Atlona AVoIP in Education and Esports case study.

Esports is a Growing Industry

These technologies are essential to creating an immersive and professional Esports environment on campus, elevating both player performance and viewer engagement.
SONY - Esports - Exertis Almo Webinar

As noted by rAVe in this 2024 “Esports and ProAV“ webinar description, “Virtually every college and university in North America is exploring ways to incorporate Esports on their campuses. Over 75 colleges in the USA already recognize it as a Division 1 sport. Moreover, the International Olympic Committee is considering its inclusion in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics.”

Esports on college campuses is not just a trend—it’s an evolving industry that demands sophisticated Pro AV solutions. From displays and audio systems to live streaming setups and control systems, the right technology ensures a seamless and engaging experience for players, spectators, and broadcasters alike.

By partnering with a trusted AV distributor like Exertis Almo, integrators can confidently deliver solutions for campus gaming centers as well as meet the high standards of collegiate Esports, positioning their clients at the forefront of this dynamic market.

Ready to level up your next Esports installation? Contact us today to explore how we can help bring your vision to life.

Want to know more about AV tech for education? Check out “Audio-Visual Trends in Higher Education That Elevate the Learning Experience“.

Building Better Meeting Spaces – A Focus on Simplicity and Efficiency

In the fast-paced world of professional AV, resellers and integrators are tasked with delivering solutions that meet their clients’ needs while staying ahead of market trends. One of the biggest challenges in recent years has been designing meeting spaces that are not only technologically advanced but also intuitive and simple for end-users. No one wants to spend precious time troubleshooting a conference room setup right before a big meeting. So, how do you offer your clients cutting-edge solutions without overwhelming them with complexity? The answer lies in simplifying the experience.

The Simplicity Trend: What Clients Really Want

One thing is clear in today’s market: clients are increasingly looking for streamlined, easy-to-use solutions for their meeting spaces. This trend comes down to a few key reasons:

1. Ease of Use

The last thing a business wants is a complex setup that requires extensive training to operate. Meeting technology should work seamlessly, whether it’s a small huddle room or a large boardroom. If a system is too complicated, it won’t be used to its full potential—if at all. Clients want to walk into a room, push a button, and start their meeting without delays.

Barco ClickShare meeting space2. Time Efficiency

Meetings are often scheduled back-to-back, leaving no room for tech hiccups. Solutions that are quick to set up and easy to navigate help businesses save time and minimize frustrations. The more intuitive the system, the less likely users will run into problems, which means fewer support calls and faster meeting turnarounds.

3. Reducing the Learning Curve

No matter how advanced the technology, it will only be as useful as its ease of operation. When clients don’t have to spend time learning how to use the equipment, or calling for support to troubleshoot an issue, they’re more likely to fully adopt the solution. This helps create a smoother user experience that boosts productivity and engagement.

4. Long-Term Benefits of Smarter Design

As resellers and integrators, we know that designing a system that is simple and intuitive doesn’t happen by accident. It requires foresight and a deep understanding of how the technology will be used. Sometimes, this means investing more effort upfront—spending time with clients to understand their exact needs, carefully selecting the right components, and designing a solution that will work seamlessly from day one.

This approach is not just about installing hardware and software; it’s about educating ourselves and working smarter during the early stages of the design process. By putting in the time to create a well-thought-out system, you save both yourself and your client from hours of future troubleshooting and support. It’s a classic case of “work smarter, not harder.”

Think of it this way: the more time you invest upfront to make sure the system is simple and effective, the less time you’ll spend fielding calls from frustrated clients or having to walk users through technical procedures. Not only does this improve client satisfaction, but it also frees up your own time to focus on new opportunities rather than support issues.

5. Remote and Hybrid Work

hybrid work from home officeWith more companies embracing hybrid work environments, it’s crucial for conference room technology to integrate well with both in-office and remote participants. Solutions must offer clear, reliable communication, both in terms of video and audio, and should seamlessly connect with common conferencing platforms. Simplicity here is key: the technology should accommodate this hybrid style of work without any additional effort on the part of the user.

Ultimately, when we, as professionals, take the time to thoroughly understand the client’s needs and design a streamlined, intuitive solution from the start, we reduce the long-term strain on both sides. Clients get systems that just work, and we save time and effort on support and troubleshooting. It’s a win-win for everyone involved.

All-in-One Trend

One significant trend in simplifying meeting spaces is the rise of all-in-one products. Traditionally, designing a conference room involved integrating multiple components—cameras, microphones, speakers, and content-sharing devices—each from different manufacturers. This often means juggling different warranties, software updates, and setup processes.

Now, however, all-in-one solutions are transforming how resellers and integrators approach conference room designs. These systems combine essential A/V components into a single unit, making it easier to install, configure, and maintain. They also reduce the complexity for end-users, allowing them to focus on their meetings rather than figuring out which button to press next.

For resellers and integrators, these simplified solutions are a major selling point. Offering clients a more efficient way to manage their meeting spaces can set you apart in the market. By promoting the benefits of ease of use, time savings, and integration capabilities, you position yourself as a trusted advisor who understands the importance of both technology and user experience. Additionally, all-in-one solutions often have fewer moving parts, reducing the risk of compatibility issues or failures. This translates into fewer support calls for resellers and a more satisfied client base.

Barco CS wireless conferencingThis is where Barco’s ClickShare and the ClickShare all-in-one bar come into play. Barco has long been at the forefront of content sharing and collaboration solutions, offering products that prioritize ease of use without sacrificing functionality.

The ClickShare all-in-one bar is a perfect example of an innovation that addresses all the needs we’ve discussed. It combines content sharing, a camera, microphone, and speakers into a single, sleek unit. With features like automatic speaker framing and group framing, and six beamforming MEMS microphones for clear, echo-free audio, it’s an ideal solution for smaller meeting spaces (up to 15’ x 15’).

Barco CS meeting share laptopFor larger spaces where an “all-in-one” solution is not practical, the simplicity and reliability of ClickShare can still play a central role by providing a unified experience for content sharing and collaboration. And when those larger spaces demand more customized A/V setups, Exertis Almo is here to help integrators design full-scale solutions to meet any need.

In an industry where technology can quickly become overwhelming, simplicity is the key to long-term success. Whether you’re outfitting a small huddle room or designing a full-scale boardroom, focusing on streamlined, all-in-one solutions like Barco ClickShare can help you deliver top-tier results without overcomplicating the experience. As resellers and integrators, this is your opportunity to stand out by making the meeting room a place where technology enhances productivity, not impedes it.

At Exertis Almo, we’re here to support you with the expertise and solutions to make this a reality for your clients. The future of meeting spaces is all about doing more with less—let’s make that future happen together.

Want to know more? Check out “Did You Say BYOM?

Nathan Dwelly BDM
About the Author

Nathan Dwelly

BDM – Brand Specialist

Supported Manufacturers: Barco ClickShare

Pin It on Pinterest